Skip to main content

Why does De Beers diamond campaign so hard?


  DeBeers is a member of a cartel and many other cartels have collapsed. Running a
diamond business is not as easy as anyone thinks. De Beers enhances the partnership in worldwide
by recruiting the skilled workforce. Inside the organization, it is responsible for creating passion
and maintaining corporate rapport. It maintains policies like vision, worth and purpose and
they are strategic.
DeBeers – Relevant Facts
De Beers is considered to be the world’s largest diamond mining and trading company in
the world. At one time, it was said to be controlling more than 45% of the worldwide production
and had been selling over 80% of all diamonds globally. It used monopolistic practices and by
being a member of a cartel, it used massive size and control of the market to financially punish
smaller miners and retailers who tried to break away from the De Beers cartel diamond “empire".
Only DeBeers controlled most of the diamond cutting and polishing industry thus creating a
monopolistic industry.
Major Issues Identified for DeBeers
 After reading the case study, I have identified the following major issues from the case: 1. Increased Government Oversight: In a monopolistic system, the companies try to maximize their profits by boosting imaginary costs, driving demands and increasing
the price. Since there is no competition, the retail price DeBeers sets is the final price.
With the increased government oversight, DeBeers would not be able to manipulate the
value chain, cost dynamics nor avoid taxes 2. The advent of synthetic diamonds that reduce DeBeers’ monopoly: While DeBeers
controlled more than 80.0% of the global sale, the consumers had to depend on DeBeers
The External Environment because it controlled the entire value chain. But the scientists invented a mechanism to
create synthetic diamonds which meant that DeBeers could not control nor monopolize
the market anymore (McAdams and Reavis, 2008, pp 4 -5. ).

PESTEL Analysis
Table 1. shows the complete PESTEL Analysis for DeBeers
PESTEL Relevant Facts and Description P (Political) The Growing pressure from the local African communities to increase DeBeers’ participation in economic and social development led to DeBeers’ change in strategy to focuse more on the African region. This also caused DeBeers to sell off some of the assets  to African businesses. E (Economic) There is an anticipation in diamond gross sales in the U.S.A. DeBeers is not able to focus on merchandizing and as well as gross sale strategies. It is unable to cope with increased costs S (Social) Due to the increased pressure from the NGOs in the 1990’s, DeBeers, the then cartel, was forced to adopt the Kimberly Process. This meant that all diamonds that will be traded in the global market have to be certified conflict-free. This restricted DeBeers monopolistic and cartel style business. Additionally, DeBeers was required to contribute towards social development in Africa. T (Technological) With the CVD technology, the production of synthetic diamond became viable and cost effective.  DeBeers was not able to control the monopolistic nature of the diamond market anymore. E (Environmental) Natural diamond mining is harmful to wildlife and dangerous to human lives than synthetic diamond production. The pollution attached to diamond mining caused DeBeers to change its strategy so that all stakeholders involved are properly addressed and taken care of.
The External Environment


L (Legal) There have been numerous changes and amendments in laws that indicted DeBeers for violation of Antitrust laws. The laws in African countries too were made stringent which prevented DeBeers from exploiting. DeBeers is now forced to adhere to Kimberly Process. (McAdams and Reavis, 2008, pp. 6 – 10)
DeBeers and Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
Table 2. shows Porter’s Five Forces in the Context of DeBeers
Porter’s Forces DeBeers and Description Potential Entrants Very low. Due to synthetic diamond, the mining for natural diamond would decrease and DeBeers would not have any competition in the natural diamond mining. Threat of Substitutes High. Synthetic diamonds that are flawlessly made pose a great threat to DeBeers Bargaining Power of Buyers High. The buyers have now choices: either natural or synthetic. Synthetic diamonds are cheaper. So, buyers have more power who might ditch DeBeers Bargaining Power of Suppliers Medium. DeBeers do not have control on the market anymore due to many suppliers and regulations. Competitive rivalry High. Since CVD technology produces cheaper diamonds and there is a demand for diamonds, there would be many current players who would adapt technology and pose threat to DeBeers who has lost control of the value chain.  (UKessays, 2017)
Conclusion
 DeBeers was a monopoly but not anymore, thanks to technology that produces synthetic
diamonds and thanks to government regulations, social awareness, media activism and pressures.
The external environment has reduced the stronghold of DeBeers which helped to regulate the
entire diamond industry, making it more responsible.
The External Environment


References
McAdams, D and Reavis, C (2008, Jan 07). DeBeers’s Diamond Dilemma. Retrieved Jul 10,
2019 from
https://my.uopeople.edu/pluginfile.php/515756/mod_workshop/instructauthors/U3%20De
Beers%20Diamond%20Dilemma%20McAdams.pdf
McAdams, D and Reavis, C (2008, Jan 07). DeBeers’s Diamond Dilemma. Retrieved Jul 10,
2019 from
https://my.uopeople.edu/pluginfile.php/515756/mod_workshop/instructauthors/U3%20De
Beers%20Diamond%20Dilemma%20McAdams.pdf
UKessays (2017, Jan 17). De Beers Case Study. Retrieved Jul 10, 2019 from
https://www.ukessays.com/essays/economics/diamond-industry-case-study-de-beers
economics-essay.php 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How the four areas of cultural intelligence aid a leader in understanding culture as well as intercultural efforts?

The introduction to this Unit points out that technological and globalization have taken our interdependence with our work colleagues outside the office. We are now connected in so many ways, to so many people, from so many walks of life. Such, often unintentional, interconnectedness changes the rules about how we need to think about the world and how we need to interact with the people we meet in it. Cultural intelligence can help us negotiate this new world, help us engage people, “create systems of inclusion” (Saylor, 2012, p.188), and thereby be more included ourselves. The four areas in which cultural intelligence will significantly improve our understanding of culture and intercultural work are; reframing, adaptive work, systems thinking, and consciousness. (Saylor, 2012, p.187) Cultural intelligence is our ability to successfully adapt to unfamiliar cultural settings. (Saylor, 2012, p.68) Reframing, adaptive work, systems thinking, and consciousness are all part of our cult...
Post a Comment
Read more

How does Self-Efficacy Impact Leadership?

          “Self-belief does not necessarily ensure success, but self-disbelief assuredly spawns failure” (Bandura, 1997). This typically emphasized the importance of self-efficacy in relation to Cultural Intelligence (CQ). Self-efficacy has to do with the belief that one has the ability to meet a goal he or she wants to accomplish, and its impact on how he or she subsequently feels and acts (Cultural Intelligence for Leaders, 2012). This is a reminisce of the case of Kalia, in this case, study, whose low self-efficacy is negatively impacting on her ability to unite her team. Kalia is heading a diverse team of eight staff members within a large organization. It is evident there is conflict across her team, and the cross of the matter appears to be grounded in cultural differences linked to age, ethnicity, and gender. According to our reading text, Kalia has been able to identify the problem, but her constraint is how to address the issues because she seems not ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Work life balance tips for HRs

Benefits—Tangible and to the Culture of an organization that undertakes the adoption of policies designed to help employees with work-life balance?  What does an organization stand to gain if it can work through the growing pains of implementation?    Employers who choose to adopt some work-life policies may find that the candidate pool of applicants increases since employee are always interested in balancing their work and personal lives.  Clearly, a benefit is being able to attract the best possible candidates.  Absenteeism may decrease if employees are able to better structure their lives because of time, or a day, to be taken may not need to be taken if the employee is able to use a flexible schedule, (Kossek, 2009).  Additionally, those employees who wish to start a family may feel at ease knowing that as circumstances in their life changes, their employer has mechanisms for employee flexibility.  This means that there may be less absenteeism....
Post a Comment
Read more