Skip to main content

Employment Laws

In my experience, one of the more complicated situations with employment law to learn and understand is the duty to accommodate.  The central premise may seem simple but over the years I have learned about the breadth of situations that require an employer to accommodate and also just what the courts interpret as “undue hardship” on the employer.  I believe that many people, including many managers, do not understand the wide range of situations that apply to the Human Rights Commission and the Duty to Accommodate and just far an employer must go to accommodate an employee.
In Canada, each province has a Human Rights Commission and it is this government body that oversees employment accommodation infractions and issues.  The Ontario Human Rights code states:
“The principle of accommodation applies to all grounds of the Code, but accommodation issues in employment most often relate to the needs of:
·         employees with disabilities (disability)
·         older workers (age)
·         employees with religious needs (creed)
·         pregnant women (sex)
·         employees with caregiving responsibilities (family status).”  (OHRC, n.d.)

Because of the breadth of situations that fall under this law it is difficult to create a handbook or training manual that covers it in detail.  While I have learned “the hard way” by having actual situations of requests for accommodations from employees that I have needed to review with our Executive Director (and in a couple of cases the company lawyer), it is not the best way to learn (i.e., it can be very stressful).  But, having tangible real-life situations is a good learning tool and therefore I think the best way to train this concept and the law to managers and supervisors is to have a small class where the law and company policies are reviewed and then real life case scenarios are dissected and discussed or even role-played.  By doing this in small groups with open discussion format, many possible scenarios will be brought up by the attendees which can then be reviewed in addition to case studies that the HRM has prepared in advance.  In addition to understanding what is covered and what the duty to accommodate is, it is also important to review the concept of “undue hardship” which an employer needs to prove if they are denying an accommodation.  It might be worthwhile to have a lawyer who specializes in employment law present this to the managers to impress the need for documentation and proof that the accommodation would impose undue hardship on the company and other employees.  A lawyer would also have numerous examples to provide to help managers and supervisors understand the vastness that is covered by this law.

References
OHRC (n.d.).  Meeting the accommodation need of employees on the job.  Retrieved from http://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/iv-human-rights-issues-all-stages-employment/8-meeting-accommodation-needs-employees-job

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Example of a Self-Concept Case Study

Cultural Intelligence for Leaders (2012) defined self-concept as “the totality of complex, organized, and dynamic system of learned beliefs, attitudes and opinions that each person holds to be true about his/her personal existence” & the self-concept we hold to be true helps us form a “perception of who we are based on expectations from, and responses to, our social environment; stimulated by internal and external factors that can create intense emotional responses, impacting on our willingness to learn and our choice of action - guiding our behaviors” (p. 127). In the case (WA, 2018) Jack is a 36-year-old leader within a major hospital who prides himself as a professional. In his work, he supports and helps each of his team members. In his personal life, he used to focus on eating healthy and exercising regularly. In the past year, his focus on healthy living declined because of professional responsibilities. As a consequence, his state of health deteriorated to a point that hi

DeBeers - the diamond trading company

PESTEL analysis Political aspect: In 1994 the DeBeers operation was prohibited in the United States territory because of antitrust legislation. These facts complicate the DeBeers operation and shake the whole company. Economic aspect: Although in 1990s DeBeers ruled the whole industry, after several events such as Soviet Union collapse and Alrosa’s appearing, DeBeers lost its control over the market. In addition, Canada’s appearing in the diamond market forced DeBeers to hold back a large portion of its diamonds from the market and purchase much of the excess supply from these producing countries often at inflated prices (McAdams, Reavis, 2008, p.7). Social aspect: In the mid-1990, Angola, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Democratic Republic Congo were outflanked by rebel forces opposed to the government. DeBeers sponsored this military conflict by “blood diamonds” purchasing. Technological aspect: The main threat is the synthetic diamonds grown is the lab-conditions. This tec

Case Study 2: Young, Confident, and Moving too Fast

Introduction             The increasing complexities of organizations as it grows and as some take the path of globalization resulted in diversity and attracted many forms of cultural differences. Hence, the need to manage these cultural differences existing within organizations has been increasingly becoming necessary. This is particularly true for managers who may be caught in between various individual culture that each of its subordinates is accustomed to. Managing cultural differences requires what they called cultural intelligence (CQ). Broadly speaking, CQ is the ability to cut across various cultural contexts such as ethnic, generational, or organizational cultures (Livermore, 2011, p. 5). In this paper, the generational cultural differences between Joanne, the manager, and Julia, the newly hired subordinate will be discussed. To give a brief background, Julia is a confident, fast learner, and passionate young woman who wants to do more in her job without being micromanaged