Skip to main content

What is Cognitive Dissonance ?

Cognitive Dissonance (CD) is a feeling of internal discomfort caused by conflicting ideas, values, beliefs or practices. Because of the need to maintain harmony, people try to reduce or prevent this discomfort. The theory of CD offers three options to reduce stress: - changing attitudes or beliefs, acquiring new information (dissonance reduction process) and reducing the importance of cognitions (internal reasoning and justification) (Cooper, 2007). However, it is not always the case that CD is bad. We shall discuss whether it is good for organizations and for individuals
To a larger extent, cognitive dissonance is not good. It can lead to absenteeism. Stress at workplace causes workers not to report for duty. Excuses are given, without addressing the root cause of the problem. Financial losses to organizations arising from this type of absenteeism are obvious and significant.
Stressed employees often withdraw and cease to participate in work-related issues. They might attend crucial meetings but will not meaningfully participate or contribute to their ideas. They also alienate themselves from important organization processes they meant to drive therefore jeopardizing the company performance. Negative emotions such as anxiety and anger can manifest and consequently affect the work environment. Some may even sabotage others during the course of working thus affecting productivity.
Leaders can allow their organizations to bury their inclusion blind spots; the things you cannot see because they are hidden or they choose not to see them. in this case, overestimating or underestimating cultural abilities take place. However, opportunities may be missed since focus won’t be on that blind spot. Leaders should, therefore, help their subordinates to recognize their self-concept so as to understand their blind spot. Therefore, leaders should ‘be open to the possibilities that their beliefs. Or the organization’s beliefs, are not aligned with their actions and behaviors,’ (Cultural Intelligence for Leaders 2012.)  Leaders should have the confidence to unravel the prevailing cultural situation and create room for conversation around cultural issues. Leaders should as well work with employees to explore dissonance. Even though people tend to stick to their cultural beliefs to alleviate emotional stress, it is important that leaders help them to understand the status quo and come up with strategies. Leaders should work with employees to fully understand their dissonance. Since leaders are the drivers of all programmes at workplaces, they should plan for some meetings to facilitate dialogue and for employees to discover the true self. By so doing,  employees will be able to understand their blind spots hence the organization can turn them into advantages.
People should as well be in a position to adapt and modify behaviors. Learning new patterns particularly new culture can be very difficult but the people should be motivated by the end result. Leaders are drives of change hence should motivate employees to participate during the process.
As highlighted earlier, change is not always accepted thus leaders should come up with strategies to engage workers in the process.  They should effectively engage employees so as to get their feelings and thoughts. Leaders should create room to receive and respond to the feedback from employees during and after the period they will be implementing change. At times it is helpful to ask probing questions so as to have a deeper understanding of their feelings towards the change.
Communicating change effectively could also help. Employees should be explicitly told what is going on so that they may participate meaningfully.  Both formal and informal communication means should be used to ensure everyone receives the news about the change.
References
Paycor (2016) Overcoming employee resistance to change in the workplace. Retrieved from https://www.paycor.com/resource-center/change-management-in-the-workplace-why-do-employees-resist-it
Cultural Intelligence for Leaders (2012). Saylor Academy. Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DeBeers - the diamond trading company

PESTEL analysis Political aspect: In 1994 the DeBeers operation was prohibited in the United States territory because of antitrust legislation. These facts complicate the DeBeers operation and shake the whole company. Economic aspect: Although in 1990s DeBeers ruled the whole industry, after several events such as Soviet Union collapse and Alrosa’s appearing, DeBeers lost its control over the market. In addition, Canada’s appearing in the diamond market forced DeBeers to hold back a large portion of its diamonds from the market and purchase much of the excess supply from these producing countries often at inflated prices (McAdams, Reavis, 2008, p.7). Social aspect: In the mid-1990, Angola, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Democratic Republic Congo were outflanked by rebel forces opposed to the government. DeBeers sponsored this military conflict by “blood diamonds” purchasing. Technological aspect: The main threat is the synthetic diamonds grown is the lab-conditions. This tec

Example of a Self-Concept Case Study

Cultural Intelligence for Leaders (2012) defined self-concept as “the totality of complex, organized, and dynamic system of learned beliefs, attitudes and opinions that each person holds to be true about his/her personal existence” & the self-concept we hold to be true helps us form a “perception of who we are based on expectations from, and responses to, our social environment; stimulated by internal and external factors that can create intense emotional responses, impacting on our willingness to learn and our choice of action - guiding our behaviors” (p. 127). In the case (WA, 2018) Jack is a 36-year-old leader within a major hospital who prides himself as a professional. In his work, he supports and helps each of his team members. In his personal life, he used to focus on eating healthy and exercising regularly. In the past year, his focus on healthy living declined because of professional responsibilities. As a consequence, his state of health deteriorated to a point that hi

What is Acquire, Build, Contemplate, and Do ?

          According to our reading text Cultural Intelligence for Leaders (2012), to acquire knowledge has to do with the cognition and developing the understanding of the different aspects of culture. It is important that we understand and are able to identify the cultural elements and their relations such as the channels of communication and their impact on behaviors and attitudes of the people (Cultural Intelligence for Leaders, 2012).           Metacognition comes to play when we build our strategic thinking that explores the knowledge we acquired in an unfamiliar culture. A person should be able to analyze the data collected in the previous step to detect patterns or causes. Doing this analysis helps us to understand the behaviors and attitudes of people (Cultural Intelligence for Leaders, 2012).           Because of the possibility that we may encounter difficulties while trying to become familiar with our surroundings and any unfamiliar event, we tend to contemplate our mot