Skip to main content

Why Global leaders need to be able to nimbly adapt to different situations?

Although a consensus definition of authentic leadership is hard to pin down, the underpinning of the concept can be summarized as a leadership approach that focuses on consistent alignment between what leaders think/believe, what they say and what they do. Bishop (2013) rightly adds an ethical dimension to this construct, pointing to the need for this alignment to be on the side of moral standards. In other words, authentic leadership, particularly in the context of cultural intelligence, must necessarily be an exercise of leadership where the leader maintain congruence between her thoughts/beliefs, words and actions, and which results in a greater good for everyone involved. Without this ethical dimension, authentic leadership, or, for that matter, any other kind of leadership, is pointless.
Metacognitive CQ is how much we know about our own approach to thinking and learning and the structures that exist in our mind that guide and support our learning process. In other words, metacognitive CQ is how we understand the broader context, including cultural elements, and the impact that it will have on the way that our cognitive CQ can or will develop.
Cognitive CQ is the knowledge a person possesses about the relevant cultural elements that surround her. Cognitive CQ is about the explicit information that a person can collect and process to understand the applicable cultural principles and values.
Whereas cognitive CQ is about what we learn, metacognitive CQ is about how we learn it.
According to Volgesang et al. (2009), motivational CQ refers to the objectives and rewards stemming from gathering information about different cultures and environments and thereby develop the knowledge and skills to adjust to cultural differences and harness their full potential.
Behavioral CQ refers to the ability of a leader to translate the cognitive, metacognitive and motivational information identified at other CQ levels to concrete actions that will use culturally appropriate conventions to deliver organizational or individual results.   
Simply put, the way the four features of cultural intelligence work together in conjunction with Authentic Leadership is that metacognitive CQ and cognitive CQ refer to the processes related to how a leader collects information and what information she collects to shape thoughts and beliefs; the motivational CQ refers to how a leader establishes goals and incentives around said thoughts and beliefs; and the behavioral CQ refers to what a leader specifically does to make sure that incentives and goals are culturally relevant, aligned and that they serve to further organizational success.
In sum, cultural intelligence is the framework that an authentic leader uses to assess and ensure alignment between what she thinks/believes, says and does.  
CQ is an approach to identifying and assessing relevant cultural information that helps to educate leaders on the nature of the differences between different situations and the best way to address them. Without CQ, leaders will simply not know what they don’t know. With CQ leaders can see cultural layers in their interactions and identify areas that can be leveraged to achieve full potential and challenges that need to be addressed from a cultural perspective.
It is CQ that prompts questions about “the need to be able to nimbly adapt to different situations, adjusting quickly.” CQ also determines the extent of the need, the nature of the nimbleness, the extent of the differences and the required adjustments.
References
Bishop, William H. (2013) "Defining the Authenticity in Authentic Leadership," The Journal of Values-Based Leadership: 6(10). Available at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=jvbl
Vogelgesang, G., Clapp-Smith, R. Palmer, N. (2009). The Role of Authentic Leadership and Cultural Intelligence in Cross-Cultural Contexts: An Objectivist Perspective. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(2), 102-117. Retrieved from: http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol5iss2/IJLS_vol5_iss2_vogelgesang_authentic_leadership.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DeBeers - the diamond trading company

PESTEL analysis Political aspect: In 1994 the DeBeers operation was prohibited in the United States territory because of antitrust legislation. These facts complicate the DeBeers operation and shake the whole company. Economic aspect: Although in 1990s DeBeers ruled the whole industry, after several events such as Soviet Union collapse and Alrosa’s appearing, DeBeers lost its control over the market. In addition, Canada’s appearing in the diamond market forced DeBeers to hold back a large portion of its diamonds from the market and purchase much of the excess supply from these producing countries often at inflated prices (McAdams, Reavis, 2008, p.7). Social aspect: In the mid-1990, Angola, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Democratic Republic Congo were outflanked by rebel forces opposed to the government. DeBeers sponsored this military conflict by “blood diamonds” purchasing. Technological aspect: The main threat is the synthetic diamonds grown is the lab-conditions. This tec...

What are the Cultural Makeup We are Unaware Of?

          Having a thorough understanding of cultural influences and components is a prerequisite that helps employers and the human capital managers tolerate and better manage individuals and employees with cultural differences to avoid misconceptions and altercations due to “cultural misunderstandings” (Lynch, 2017).           In as much as there are tangible aspects/elements of culture such as dressing, language, food, etc., the biggest components of culture are actually hidden beneath the surface. This comprises of the invisible values and rules that differentiate one culture from the other (Penstone, 2011). It is always difficult to use the rule of culture to interpret the components of another culture. Crucially, the tangible and visible aspect of a culture is usually influenced by the hidden components, such as values, notion, attitudes, and assumptions (Penstone, 2011). Edward T. Hall in his 1976 theory de...

how can HR Managers help raise the cultural intelligence of an organization.

I will start by saying that, I have worked for 2 employers so far in my 12 years career and I do not think the HR took any substantial step to raise cultural awareness. Saying that I will share my thoughts on what the HR can do.             I have always worked in multinational companies with people from various national backgrounds. While working regardless of cultural differences you are supposed to know your work and deliver. So, there is no bonding or cultural exchanges happen. But someone like myself who worked in multiple geographies can easily distinguish between work culture in India, USA, and Australia.             So, first thing, HR can do, before sending employees in foreign assignments they can train them about the countries culture and people. Along with any other training that is useful. In fact, I would say, learning the language and being able to follow accent i...