Although a consensus definition of authentic leadership is hard to pin down, the underpinning of the concept can be summarized as a leadership approach that focuses on consistent alignment between what leaders think/believe, what they say and what they do. Bishop (2013) rightly adds an ethical dimension to this construct, pointing to the need for this alignment to be on the side of moral standards. In other words, authentic leadership, particularly in the context of cultural intelligence, must necessarily be an exercise of leadership where the leader maintain congruence between her thoughts/beliefs, words and actions, and which results in a greater good for everyone involved. Without this ethical dimension, authentic leadership, or, for that matter, any other kind of leadership, is pointless.
Metacognitive CQ is how much we know about our own approach to thinking and learning and the structures that exist in our mind that guide and support our learning process. In other words, metacognitive CQ is how we understand the broader context, including cultural elements, and the impact that it will have on the way that our cognitive CQ can or will develop.
Cognitive CQ is the knowledge a person possesses about the relevant cultural elements that surround her. Cognitive CQ is about the explicit information that a person can collect and process to understand the applicable cultural principles and values.
Whereas cognitive CQ is about what we learn, metacognitive CQ is about how we learn it.
According to Volgesang et al. (2009), motivational CQ refers to the objectives and rewards stemming from gathering information about different cultures and environments and thereby develop the knowledge and skills to adjust to cultural differences and harness their full potential.
Behavioral CQ refers to the ability of a leader to translate the cognitive, metacognitive and motivational information identified at other CQ levels to concrete actions that will use culturally appropriate conventions to deliver organizational or individual results.
Simply put, the way the four features of cultural intelligence work together in conjunction with Authentic Leadership is that metacognitive CQ and cognitive CQ refer to the processes related to how a leader collects information and what information she collects to shape thoughts and beliefs; the motivational CQ refers to how a leader establishes goals and incentives around said thoughts and beliefs; and the behavioral CQ refers to what a leader specifically does to make sure that incentives and goals are culturally relevant, aligned and that they serve to further organizational success.
In sum, cultural intelligence is the framework that an authentic leader uses to assess and ensure alignment between what she thinks/believes, says and does.
CQ is an approach to identifying and assessing relevant cultural information that helps to educate leaders on the nature of the differences between different situations and the best way to address them. Without CQ, leaders will simply not know what they don’t know. With CQ leaders can see cultural layers in their interactions and identify areas that can be leveraged to achieve full potential and challenges that need to be addressed from a cultural perspective.
It is CQ that prompts questions about “the need to be able to nimbly adapt to different situations, adjusting quickly.” CQ also determines the extent of the need, the nature of the nimbleness, the extent of the differences and the required adjustments.
References
Bishop, William H. (2013) "Defining the Authenticity in Authentic Leadership," The Journal of Values-Based Leadership: 6(10). Available at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=jvbl
Vogelgesang, G., Clapp-Smith, R. Palmer, N. (2009). The Role of Authentic Leadership and Cultural Intelligence in Cross-Cultural Contexts: An Objectivist Perspective. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(2), 102-117. Retrieved from: http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol5iss2/IJLS_vol5_iss2_vogelgesang_authentic_leadership.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment