Skip to main content

Week 2 Discussion post 8


 Discuss how cultural strategic thinking plays a part within your current organization or an organization that you are familiar with.  What two specific cultural strategic thinking techniques have you observed within your team? Did you see evidence of Cultural Intelligence (CQ)? Using the article you read and your text discuss some of what you observed, both in terms of positives and deficits and discuss how CQ could have been improved.

Discuss how cultural, strategic thinking plays a part within your current organization or an organization that you are familiar with.
I work in a multinational software company with several offices across America, Europe and Asia with over 7,000 developers. Thus, cultural strategic thinking is critical to our success.

However, the way the implement train employees are based on three factors: online training and hands-on experience, evaluation. The organization has a website with onboarding videos about the organizations, beginning, rules, culture, etc. I remember when I joined, the videos were exciting to me because this was the first time I worked in an enterprise with some employees. One of the videos does talk about the values of the organization which among other things are respect and openness. Respect for other belief and nationalities. Openness, the organization provides multiple tools to communicate with anyone in the organization, even the CEO and other directors are reachable (though, later I realized, you supposed not to contact just because… but that’s another story).

The second's tool is through hands-on experience. Due to the nature of the IT industry, it is common to work with people in multiple locations. Thus, the organization hopes that everything will be resolved in the teams, without further escalation, in part due to the open channels and various layers of management that at some point will resolve conflicts or training if needed.

The third tool the organization has is the evaluation. Twice a year, we have a performance assessment performed by the people we have work during that period, including the managers and people above the chain of command that we may not know, but they do know us. We are evaluated in many divisions such as values, technical skills and most importantly, soft skills.

I believe the organization does very little to address the social thinking, for instance, I have not received a “strategy cultural thinking” training. However, the organization is very successful, and I have not known of an issue due to the combinations of the mentioned tools.

What two specific cultural strategic thinking techniques have you observed within your team?
[continued] Therefore, I believe that the organization uses the following cultural, strategic thinking techniques: Peer learning, writing about your experiences, mentoring.

Mentoring is the most significant technique because in the organization we do have a structure of mentor-mentee. Sometimes we formally select a mentor who will aid our career development until we are a position to train others. Indirectly, the performance assessment also helps our learning process which is a document in an information system.

Did you see evidence of Cultural Intelligence (CQ)?
[continued] I believe the organization has created an incredible culture which it is subtle but it is there and is so powerful. Furthermore, the ability to make people of different languages, nationalities, beliefs, and skills interact seamlessly, is the most valuable assets of the organization.

For me, it has been a fantastic experience, but I most said that my knowledge is based on working with IT related people. It will be interesting to know how salespeople or directors directly interact with business clients/partners across the globe.


References
Cultural Intelligence for Leaders (2012). Saylor Academy. Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0. Retrieved September 6th, 2018, from https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_leading-with-cultural-intelligence/index.html


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DeBeers - the diamond trading company

PESTEL analysis Political aspect: In 1994 the DeBeers operation was prohibited in the United States territory because of antitrust legislation. These facts complicate the DeBeers operation and shake the whole company. Economic aspect: Although in 1990s DeBeers ruled the whole industry, after several events such as Soviet Union collapse and Alrosa’s appearing, DeBeers lost its control over the market. In addition, Canada’s appearing in the diamond market forced DeBeers to hold back a large portion of its diamonds from the market and purchase much of the excess supply from these producing countries often at inflated prices (McAdams, Reavis, 2008, p.7). Social aspect: In the mid-1990, Angola, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Democratic Republic Congo were outflanked by rebel forces opposed to the government. DeBeers sponsored this military conflict by “blood diamonds” purchasing. Technological aspect: The main threat is the synthetic diamonds grown is the lab-conditions. This tec...

What are the Cultural Makeup We are Unaware Of?

          Having a thorough understanding of cultural influences and components is a prerequisite that helps employers and the human capital managers tolerate and better manage individuals and employees with cultural differences to avoid misconceptions and altercations due to “cultural misunderstandings” (Lynch, 2017).           In as much as there are tangible aspects/elements of culture such as dressing, language, food, etc., the biggest components of culture are actually hidden beneath the surface. This comprises of the invisible values and rules that differentiate one culture from the other (Penstone, 2011). It is always difficult to use the rule of culture to interpret the components of another culture. Crucially, the tangible and visible aspect of a culture is usually influenced by the hidden components, such as values, notion, attitudes, and assumptions (Penstone, 2011). Edward T. Hall in his 1976 theory de...

how can HR Managers help raise the cultural intelligence of an organization.

I will start by saying that, I have worked for 2 employers so far in my 12 years career and I do not think the HR took any substantial step to raise cultural awareness. Saying that I will share my thoughts on what the HR can do.             I have always worked in multinational companies with people from various national backgrounds. While working regardless of cultural differences you are supposed to know your work and deliver. So, there is no bonding or cultural exchanges happen. But someone like myself who worked in multiple geographies can easily distinguish between work culture in India, USA, and Australia.             So, first thing, HR can do, before sending employees in foreign assignments they can train them about the countries culture and people. Along with any other training that is useful. In fact, I would say, learning the language and being able to follow accent i...